Extraction of Ultrasonography Images Using Ratio of Geometric Operations
Retno Supriyanti, Ades Wahyu Dwi Susilo, Yogi Ramadhani, Arwita Mulyawati, and Haris B. Widodo
Jenderal Soedirman University, Purwokerto, Indonesia
Abstract—The use of ultrasonography as a support machine diagnosis in the medical field has been commonly used today. Based on this fact we need accurate information from ultrasonography image. Currently there some kinds of ultrasonography machine such as 2D, 3D or 4D ultrasonography. Although there are many functions of using ultrasonography, however, the largest use of ultrasonography is for prenatal care. In this research we use 2D ultrasonography because this kind of ultrasonography is widely available in the developing countries. In other hand, there many researches about exploring ultrasonography images. In this paper we will do a comparative analysis study for ultrasonography image especially focus on uterus area by comparing moment values produced by central moment, spatial moment and invariant moment. Extraction analysis will be implemented to geometric operation such as rotation, translation and scale. The result show that invariant moments feature is the best choice for exploring information about ultrasonography images especially information about uterus region.
Index Terms—ultrasonography, prenatal care, geometric operation, central moment, spatial moment, invariant moment
Cite: Retno Supriyanti, Ades Wahyu Dwi Susilo, Yogi Ramadhani, Arwita Mulyawati, and Haris B. Widodo, "Extraction of Ultrasonography Images Using Ratio of Geometric Operations," Journal of Medical and Bioengineering, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 206-212, June 2015. Doi: 10.12720/jomb.4.3.206-212
Index Terms—ultrasonography, prenatal care, geometric operation, central moment, spatial moment, invariant moment
Cite: Retno Supriyanti, Ades Wahyu Dwi Susilo, Yogi Ramadhani, Arwita Mulyawati, and Haris B. Widodo, "Extraction of Ultrasonography Images Using Ratio of Geometric Operations," Journal of Medical and Bioengineering, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 206-212, June 2015. Doi: 10.12720/jomb.4.3.206-212
Array